olympic check-in

I'm thoroughly enjoying watching The Olympics. I'm not watching in any organized, concerted way, just turning on the TV more than I normally would and tuning in to whatever sport is on. (Unless it's figure skating, then I turn it off.)

I'm really enjoying the coverage at the venues themselves, which is informative, purely sports-oriented and not overly patriotic. What a great change from US coverage! I could use more information about the sports, as I think Olympics coverage should assume that most people watching don't normally follow these sports, and need some instruction. However, since I'm often just watching highlights - for example, of curling - the announcers might be doing a lot of this and I'm just not catching it.

One thing I love about Olympics coverage these days is the total lack of sexism. This probably dates me, but I well remember coverage of women's sports that reeked of blatant sexism. Not any more. Progress!

The only thing I don't like about the CBC coverage is Brian Williams. Almost everything about him annoys me. I especially dislike his automatic assumption that anyone accused of cheating has cheated. Even with casual viewing, I've heard him do this many times already, and I think it's wrong. Anyone can be accused of anything, and when someone says "I didn't do it," they might be telling the truth. Not according to Mr Williams.

His opinionated commentary bothers me in general. I'm interested in sports; I'm not interested in one man's opinions. He seems to inject himself into the story whenever possible. Hey Brian, it's not about you.

(US readers, this isn't this guy, it's this guy.)

Other than that, I'm loving it. I don't know how many medals Team Canada has won so far, and I don't care. I just love seeing these incredible athletes do their thing.

Comments

  1. Rognar17 February 2006 at 06:53

    I could use more information about the sports, as I think Olympics coverage should assume that most people watching don't normally follow these sports, and need some instruction.

    I think this is par for the course in Canadian Olympic coverage (especially Winter Olympics). The assumption is that Canadians are pretty well-informed unless it is a new sport (like short-track speedskating a few years ago). You're right though. A lot of new Canadians have little knowledge of curling or hockey and could use a little primer to more fully appreciate the sport.

    The only thing I don't like about the CBC coverage is Brian Williams.

    I agree. But he's such a fixture when it comes to CBC Olympic coverage, I guess he must have some popular support.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Scott M.17 February 2006 at 06:57

    The only thing I don't like about the CBC coverage is Brian Williams.

    C'mon! The man has it down pat. Where else can you, at every opportunity, learn what time it is in Turino AND Vancouver AND Toronto AND Halifax?

    CBC: All time, all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Kyle_From_Ottawa17 February 2006 at 06:58

    The only thing I don't like about the CBC coverage is Brian Williams

    I'm not sure anyone likes him. He's inserts opinions at inapproriate times, and he doesn't have the amusement factor that Don Cherry has.

    ReplyDelete
  4. M@17 February 2006 at 07:02

    It seems I'm (at least partly) to blame for Brian Williams being on the air then! :) I'm surprised that I'm in the minority here, but there's no accounting for (my) tastes.

    Anyhow, on the subject of sexism in the sports announcing. I am a bit of a soccer nut and I have discussed with other fans the fact that in women's soccer, there is a lot more commentary about the players' physical qualities, even by female announcers. They would often praise things like players' "beautiful legs" -- whereas male players' appearance usually only got commentary when they were especially tall or short or something relevant to the game like that. (Most other fans disagreed with my assessment but I maintain that it's true -- I just never had the means to conduct an actual study. Some day!)

    So the women's boardercross (!?) finalists were lining up this morning, and what did we learn about a Canadian competitor?

    - She's a firefighter. (Isn't that cute! Making her way in the world!)
    - She's single. (Hello, boys!)

    Okay, the firefighter thing may be kind of interesting (though they mentioned it when she lined up for all three races that I saw). But that she's single? Does that deserve comment?

    I've no doubt the commentary has gotten better, but I don't think it's perfect yet.

    ReplyDelete
  5. laura k17 February 2006 at 07:45

    Okay, the firefighter thing may be kind of interesting (though they mentioned it when she lined up for all three races that I saw). But that she's single? Does that deserve comment?

    I've no doubt the commentary has gotten better, but I don't think it's perfect yet.

    That does sound sexist from here. I guess should amend my blanket statement. :)

    In any Olympic coverage I've heard so far, there's been no sexism, and that's a HUGE improvement over what I heard in my teens and 20s. In those days it was all "these gals have so much spirit", female athletes referred to by first name and male athletes by last name, inappropriate focus on their home lives (especially whether or not they had reproduced!) and, most irritating to me, gratuitous proof of heterosexuality.

    ReplyDelete
  6. laura k17 February 2006 at 07:45

    Nice to hear others dislike Brian Williams! I mistook M@'s approval for a more general sentiment. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  7. M@17 February 2006 at 08:12

    Well I'm a pretty big fan of ol' Brian, but I don't have the influence I hope for. Story of my life. Anyway, I guess I bring the average attitude around here up from "Despise" to "Simmering contempt for". Well, I tried.

    But on the more relevant side, I'm going to be paying a little closer attention to the language after this morning. Do you think that the generally improving commentary is a factor of editorial policy, or does it reflect a greater respect and equality across the society towards female athletes?

    ReplyDelete
  8. laura k17 February 2006 at 08:43

    Do you think that the generally improving commentary is a factor of editorial policy, or does it reflect a greater respect and equality across the society towards female athletes?

    I think it's the latter.

    Women's sports has come into its own and won real acceptance. Whole generations of girls have grown up knowing they can be athletes, having female athlete role models, proper training, etc - and the sports media has (to a large extent) changed to reflect that.

    It's not perfect, of course. ESPN magazine doesn't cover women's sports at all, for example, which I assume is a marketing decision about their audience.

    In the US, even though gender equality in school sports is mandated by law (it's referred to as "Title IX"), it's often not enforced, and most women's and girls' sports programs are way underfunded compared to boys' and men's.

    But it's SO much better than it used to be. The old standards would be inconceivable today.

    ReplyDelete
  9. theduckthief17 February 2006 at 09:20

    Currently we have eight medals but only one gold which we won on the first day.

    For a change I was watching the Olympics on NBC during the Men's Long Program for figure skating. And I absolutely loved what they said about Jeff Buttle. Not only that, I was thrilled when Buttle medaled after being in 6th place in the short program.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Scott M.17 February 2006 at 09:41

    For those fans of Brian Williams (Alllll right), please enjoy the Brian Williams Drinking game (original source no longer available):

    Brian Williams says "I tell you what" - 1 drink
    Brian says "We'll have that for you in a minute" - 2 drinks
    Brian does his distinctive laugh - chug until he stops laughing
    Someone in the room imitates Brian's laugh - pour your drink on them
    Brian calls whoever he's talking to by his/her full name - 1 drink
    Brian leans on his desk with both arms - 1 drink while leaning on the table or floor with both arms (don't spill!)
    Brian taps his pen - 1 drink for each tap
    Brian taps his earpiece - 1 drink for each tap
    Brian says "Lemme ask you this" - 1 drink
    Brian points or shakes his finger at the camera - 2 drinks
    Brian talks to the camera crew or the director - 2 drinks
    Brian reports what someone else told him, making it sound like a private conversation - 1 drink
    Brian says "Lots more to come" - chug until lots more comes
    Brian has a dramatic pause - chug until the pause is over
    Brian tells you the scoring of a baseball play - 1 drink for every player/number
    Brian tells you about a "great story" - 2 drinks
    Brian pronounces a name wrong - 1 drink
    Brian changes the pronunciation of a name through the course of the game/Games - 1 different drink for each different pronunciation (keep the fridge stocked!)
    Brian points out the Canadians - 1 drink (preferably a Canadian) for every Canadian
    Bri-an-se-pa-rates-ev-e-ry-syl-la-ble (i.e. Shatnerizes) - 1 drink for every syllable
    Brian makes a stern face as he talks about drugs - 1 drink followed by a good hard suck on a lemon
    Brian looks a bit silly wearing a headset microphone - 1 drink
    Brian looks quite silly wearing a headset microphone - 2 drinks
    "..when Brian says, "we'll have that coming up in about ___ minutes; that's _____ Eastern, (and he carries on with many more time zones)." Say one drink to start, and one more for each additional time zone after 1.
    "from now" after the minutes [1 drink]; the countdown to Ben Chin coming up in "fourteen... twelve... six minutes from now"
    the past two Olympics Brian has read the "big story" from a local newspaper. In Sydney I think he even had multiple papers some days. I don't think I've ever seen another broadcaster do something so stupid, right on the air. Then he holds the papers up so the camera can get a shot of the story... That's gotta be worth a chug."
    ---
    I'll add one of my own:
    "Allll right" - 1 shot

    ReplyDelete
  11. Marnie17 February 2006 at 09:47

    I love it when CBC shows a bit of the play-by-play from another country's network. This morning I saw a snippet of Italy's coverage of the men's team pursuit (speed skating), which the Italians won. The announcers were very ... vocal! This kind of thing makes me feel more connected to the rest of the world. "Aw, look how happy they are, isn't that great? I'm happy for them."

    ReplyDelete
  12. laura k17 February 2006 at 10:41

    Brian pronounces a name wrong - 1 drink

    God I hate that. Baseball announcers do this all the time, drives me nuts. How hard is it to refer to your media guide before the game, or even between innings??

    ReplyDelete
  13. Scott M.17 February 2006 at 10:47

    Off the Brian Williams topic for a moment... one of the other major differences I find between the NBC and CBC coverage is that it seems NBC feels it necessary to have someone talking all the time.

    I rather enjoy the long breaks in the CBC coverage where the commentators let the action speak for itself. It's nice to hear the background music or noise!

    Especially during the ceremonies (NBC talked non-stop during the opening ceremonies -- aargh!).

    ReplyDelete
  14. laura k17 February 2006 at 10:53

    it seems NBC feels it necessary to have someone talking all the time.

    I rather enjoy the long breaks in the CBC coverage where the commentators let the action speak for itself.

    I agree! Very much so.

    Another parallel to baseball (you can see I'm getting itchy for the season to start). The silences are part of the game. Few announcers and virtually no parks will let you experience them anymore.

    Especially during the ceremonies (NBC talked non-stop during the opening ceremonies -- aargh!).

    I've seen many people complaining online that NBC ruined the Opening Ceremonies. What a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  15. allan17 February 2006 at 10:58

    I've probably listened to Williams for a grand total of 15 minutes and from what I recall of his annoying annoucning, I would have been staggering back to the LCBO for another vat of wine.

    From reading the TV column in the Globe & Mail, it sounds like NBC is showing figure skating 24/7.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Scott M.17 February 2006 at 11:29

    I've probably listened to Williams for a grand total of 15 minutes and from what I recall of his annoying annoucning, I would have been staggering back to the LCBO for another vat of wine.

    You see, the trick is to change your point of view and look at is as laughable or funny (which the drinking game is). Approached this way, you'll find yourself intentionally tuning in when Brian Williams (CBC) is on!

    ReplyDelete
  17. laura k17 February 2006 at 12:27

    Go Finland GO!!

    Um, excuse me, why are we cheering for Finland? :)

    ReplyDelete
  18. Wrye17 February 2006 at 13:04

    I want them to give Canada a good run today. If they can beat us, they'll be in the Gold medal game, so that should be all the encouragement they need. Womens' hockey is at great risk of staying a 2-country sport, so we want other countries to strengthen.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Scott M.17 February 2006 at 13:14

    Two things I like about CBC coverage:

    All of CBC's coverage is available on Rogers on Demand, free for anyone who has a digital box, as of 6pm the next day. That's just awesome. Though having to fast-forward through the blacked-out commercials is just silly...

    The other thing I like, and have always liked, is CBC's Olympic Theme. It will be a shame to lose that when CTV takes over for the 2010 olympics.

    ReplyDelete
  20. laura k17 February 2006 at 13:34

    "My family and I are deeply sorry for all that Vice President Cheney and his family have had to go through this week," Whittington said.

    Pretty crazy. Right up there with Michael Brown (late of FEMA) saying he felt "abandoned". Bizarro World.

    ReplyDelete
  21. laura k17 February 2006 at 13:35

    All of CBC's coverage is available on Rogers on Demand, free for anyone who has a digital box, as of 6pm the next day.

    I think that's more of a Rogers promo than a feature of CBC.

    How did CTV get the coverage for 2010?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Kyle_From_Ottawa17 February 2006 at 13:37

    I think that's more of a Rogers promo than a feature of CBC.

    Well, it's a partnership between the CBC and the major cable companies (Shaw, Rogers, etc.) so I guess it's open to interpretation as to who benefits more.

    ReplyDelete
  23. laura k17 February 2006 at 13:55

    it's a partnership between the CBC and the major cable companies

    Oh, I see. I thought it was a come-on for Rogers On Demand. Which it is, but I guess it works both ways.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Wrye17 February 2006 at 14:27

    CTV is linked with TSN, I think, and just drove up with a big truck full of money, I believe. So we'll likely see the inverse of this year--TSN takes the lead and CBC picks up the surplus sports.

    I also suspect we'll see bunches of the usual CBC commentators involved in some way. Because love him or--no scratch that, tolerate him or hate him, it's just not the Olympics if it's not Brian Williams. It's some sort of pavlovian thing.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Wrye17 February 2006 at 14:37

    And clearly the victim's afraid Cheny might want to finish the job. :D

    ReplyDelete
  26. laura k17 February 2006 at 17:19

    CTV is linked with TSN, I think, and just drove up with a big truck full of money, I believe.

    That'll do it.

    TSN is the Canadian ESPN. I didn't know ESPN was related to CTV. I'll have to check that out. In fact... we have a regular reader who works for CTV. Our own ALPF.

    Amazing that Sweden beat the US! This has to be one of the biggest upsets in Olympic hockey, ever.

    ReplyDelete
  27. laura k17 February 2006 at 17:21

    it's just not the Olympics if it's not Brian Williams.

    That's a shame.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Scott M.17 February 2006 at 18:17

    So we'll likely see the inverse of this year--TSN takes the lead and CBC picks up the surplus sports.

    Unlikely. TSN (Bell GlobeMedia) teamed up with Sportsnet (Rogers) for their bid. Sportsnet will be picking up other games.

    What will be interesting is if Sportsnet uses all four of it's regional feeds to cover multiple sports...

    ReplyDelete
  29. teflonjedi17 February 2006 at 18:22

    I am very pleased to report that when I came into work today, down here in Cupertino, one of my co-workers remarked "I hear the Canadian women hockey team is kicking ass, and steam-rolling over everyone." I work with great people, and in the ensuing conversation not a sexist comment was to be had.

    I finally got to return the compliment with "I see that Norway is cleaning up on the overall medal count!"

    ReplyDelete
  30. noone17 February 2006 at 22:25

    I just realized that I must have been reflexively drowning out our Brian Williams because I can't recall one word he's ever said. I watched some skating on the Rogers Digital thing today and it was great, sort of.

    Question - does anyone like the new medals? I don't. I can't believe Italy redesigned them with a hole in them. But I'm wondering what everyone else thinks.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Marnie18 February 2006 at 04:57

    I think the medals are ugly and weird. They look like CDs on ribbons. Oh well, I don't suppose I'll be getting one myself, and there's a new design for every Olympics, so I guess I won't have to look at these for long.

    ReplyDelete
  32. laura k18 February 2006 at 06:55

    and in the ensuing conversation not a sexist comment was to be had.

    Very cool. Things like that make up for any number of Neanderthal moments.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sharia

This morning I see that Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario, is banning the Muslim religious court known as sharia . This ends months of debate about whether sharia would be legal and binding in Ontario. I'm quoting at length from the story in today's Toronto Star because many US readers are likely not up on this. In a surprise announcement that caught both supporters and opponents of sharia law off guard, Premier Dalton McGuinty says he will move quickly to ban all religious arbitration in the province. McGuinty made the announcement in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press yesterday after months of debate and controversy surrounding use of Islamic sharia law in family arbitration. "I've come to the conclusion that the debate has gone on long enough," the premier told the news agency. "There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians." The announcement prompted t
Read more

can of worms

I'm opening a sticky subject here, my need to understand causing me to throw caution to the wind. It's about Alberta. Alberta vs. the rest of the Canada. The Globe And Mail runs something about Alberta's gripes every day, and I try to follow along. If it weren't for wmtc's resident Albertan , and the ensuing arguments in comments, I would've had no warning. It's not something Americans know about. As is, observing for more than a year, I have only the smallest of clues. Here's what I know. Please pardon my ignorance and oversimplification, but I have to start somewhere. The province of Alberta is rich, because it has oil. The province of Alberta is conservative, relative to the rest of Canada. Hmm. Funny how those two go together. Because of its great oil wealth, Alberta revenue helps fund services in the rest of Canada. (These are transfer payments?) Apparently many Albertans resent this. They want to keep Alberta's money in Alberta. They don't
Read more

observation

This is something I've noticed throughout my Canadian odyssey, from our earliest trips to Toronto to today. I've waited a long time to mention it, to make sure I wasn't drawing a hasty generalization. Canadians seem very careful with money. Frugal. Cheap. Of course no generalization is absolute. But on the whole, people here seem very concerned with how much things cost, and with saving money. I'm not talking about people who simply can't afford things. I've been poor. I know what it is when your basic expenses outstrip your income, how wearing that is, the stress it puts you under. So we'll leave that aside. I'm talking about an attitude. A concern with spending the least amount of money possible, about avoiding or reducing costs if at all possible. An unwillingness to part with money. Phone bills. Parking. Cable TV. The garbage tags I blogged about yesterday. In the US, charging an extra dollar for garbage tags would not create an incentive to put out
Read more