hypocrisy du jour

Redsock just sent me something hilarious and terrific.

Down in that surreal world known as the US media, wingnuts are screaming for Hillary Clinton's head. (What's new, right?) Apparently, while addressing an African American organization on Martin Luther King Day, Clinton committed an unforgivable sin. She used the word "plantation" to describe Republican-controlled Washington, DC. The wingnuts are calling for an apology or - holy smokes, boy wonder! - her resignation!

Yes folks, it's Bizarro World, where up is down and black is white. A criminal sits in the White House, but a Senator should resign because she used a word that... what? Reminds people there was once slavery in the United States?

Now, you must know I'm not a fan of Hillary Clinton, not by a long shot. She's exactly the kind of Democrat that drove me first to Ralph Nader, then to Canada. But come on, folks! The many levels of irony at work here have set my head aspinning.

Rather than try to organize the flood of sarcasm that's trying to leap from my keyboard, I'll share this with you: the Reverend Al Sharpton's response. Nothing I could write could even aspire to this level. Watch, listen and enjoy. Thanks Allan!

Comments

  1. Granny18 January 2006 at 06:57

    I'm not a great Hillary fan either which is a shame because I was when she first came to Washington as first lady.

    She's another one of these Dems who thinks we can win by becoming "them". I think she's wrong and we need to stand for something.

    Once upon a time she did. Not perfect but she tried. If she becomes the candidate (big if), I'd probably say oh s*** and then vote for her. I won't let anything go by default.

    ReplyDelete
  2. laura k18 January 2006 at 07:19

    I'm not a great Hillary fan either which is a shame because I was when she first came to Washington as first lady.

    Yeah, I liked her then, too. She was another disappointment, just like her husband.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Potato Head18 January 2006 at 08:44

    As Atrios pointed out, just Google the phrase "Democratic plantation" to find out how loath the GOP were to affix that label to our side. By their boundless hypocrisy shall ye know them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Echomouse18 January 2006 at 13:28

    I'm in the minority here because I like Hillary Clinton. She is not afraid to call a spade a spade at times and I give her huge credit for that. Mind you, I only hear soundbites because I'm Canadian, so obviously I don't know enough to say either way if she's good for the USA. ;)

    As for Al Sharpton...LOL...I didn't think anybody could out-yell Chris on Hardball! He rocked that bit!

    ReplyDelete
  5. laura k18 January 2006 at 15:52

    I like Hillary Clinton. She is not afraid to call a spade a spade at times and I give her huge credit for that.

    In what sense?

    Hillary Clinton supported the invasion of Iraq and supports the occupation. She's among the most right-wing of Democrats.

    I'd love to hear an example of something she has said or done that you admire. (No sarcasm - I really would like to hear.)

    ReplyDelete
  6. Daniel wbc18 January 2006 at 17:50

    Thank you, L-girl for the link that shows the Al Sharpton clip. I remember when Al Sharpton was a nutcase (I grew up outside NYC and the Tawana Brawley incident was local news) but now increasingly he's the only one that says what I'm thinking. He said great things during his primary campaign and he really stands up to the Right. Can he grow to be a viable leader?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Potato Head18 January 2006 at 18:35

    Oh, and let's not forget that she switched sides on the bankruptcy "reform" bill that she had her husband veto, voting FOR hamstringing consumers when it came to her in even worse form in 2004. This is a bill that would not even make exceptions for men serving in Iraq (bankrupcty being one many problems for families serving in that criminal war).

    Oh, and she just co-sponsored an anti-flag burning amendment, apparently so no one can accuse her when she's running for President of having a soft spot for free speech. (A flag has not been burned in protest in the US in anyone's recent memory, but that doesn't stop the Republicans from wrapping themselves in it every four years with another phony cry to amend the Constitution to make burning one illegal.)

    Hillary is loathesome. But the outrage over the "plantation" reamrks is symptomatic of what we on the Left call the Might Wurlitzer, the Republican noise machine that can drown out just about any inconvenient ideas or threats to GOP hegemony.

    ReplyDelete
  8. laura k18 January 2006 at 18:39

    I remember when Al Sharpton was a nutcase (I grew up outside NYC and the Tawana Brawley incident was local news) but now increasingly he's the only one that says what I'm thinking. He said great things during his primary campaign and he really stands up to the Right. Can he grow to be a viable leader?

    Daniel WBC, you are so right.

    Being from NYC, of course I remember Sharpton's nut-job days, too. Then during the last primaries, there he was: the most consistently progressive, sane, truth-telling person on the podium. (Apologies to Carol Mosley-Braun, but Sharpton could run rings around her.)

    I've watched him grow, and have been really impressed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. laura k18 January 2006 at 18:41

    Hillary is loathesome. But the outrage over the "plantation" reamrks is symptomatic of what we on the Left call the Might Wurlitzer, the Republican noise machine that can drown out just about any inconvenient ideas or threats to GOP hegemony.

    Yes and yes. One doesn't cancel out the other; both are true.

    Thanks for the extra reminders of more of her loathesomeness.

    ReplyDelete
  10. allan18 January 2006 at 19:39

    Tresy, you are oh so right.
    I would chew my own leg off before I voted for her.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Echomouse18 January 2006 at 20:10

    Here are the comments I've heard from her, which is really about all I know of her.

    When Bill was President, Hillary went on the Today morning show and said that he was being victimized by a "vast right wing conspiracy". I remember it threw all the Republicans into a tizzy. Viewing the whole situation against the Clintons from Canada, I liked her for speaking up about that. It seemed true to me. Looking back now, compared to what Shrub has gotten away with, what they were critical of Bill Clinton for is mind numbingly minor in comparison.

    Then this latest plantation comment. I like that she said it and I agree with her.

    It's these comments which make me like her. But as I said, I have no idea about her politics or anything she's done as Senator. I know she's very driven, in terms of her career ambitions, and I can appreciate that too. But from what others have said here in your comments, Hillary is sacrificing Americans' welfare and well-being by her choices as Senator. That's clearly not good. So I can understand why others don't like her.

    It's easier for me, being in Canada and not affected by her, to like her as a person. But as a politician, no I probably would not like her if she's sacrificing American lives for career gain. She sounds like Harper, from what you guys have said here in comments.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Nicole19 January 2006 at 03:51

    Thanks for the link. God I love it when he gets rolling.

    I'm not a Hillary fan myself either but this broohaha is just silly.

    ReplyDelete
  13. laura k19 January 2006 at 06:29

    Thanks, Echo Mouse. I know what you're saying. She's an outspoken and tough-minded woman, and she has verbally stood up to the wingnuts, and that's refreshing. I agree.

    Unfortunately, she's part of what has made the Democrats so contemptible. And that's the bottom line when it comes to an elected official. We can't support people we like personally when they're selling out their party and their country.

    P.S. I liked the vast right-wing conspiracy line, too. Too bad it seems like Hillary has joined them.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Granny19 January 2006 at 08:11

    My Senior Senator supported the flag burning amendment as well. Barbara Boxer of course opposed it.

    Dianne Feinstein is another "centrist" who usually does the right thing at the last minute but sometimes I remember the Dianne, Mayor of San Francisco, and wonder what happened to her. Politics, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Granny19 January 2006 at 08:14

    P. S. I too admire anyone who stands by what they believe even when I'm sure they're wrong.

    I just don't think that's what Hillary Clinton believes. I think it's political expediency which bothers me much more than her stance on Iraq or the flag.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sharia

This morning I see that Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario, is banning the Muslim religious court known as sharia . This ends months of debate about whether sharia would be legal and binding in Ontario. I'm quoting at length from the story in today's Toronto Star because many US readers are likely not up on this. In a surprise announcement that caught both supporters and opponents of sharia law off guard, Premier Dalton McGuinty says he will move quickly to ban all religious arbitration in the province. McGuinty made the announcement in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press yesterday after months of debate and controversy surrounding use of Islamic sharia law in family arbitration. "I've come to the conclusion that the debate has gone on long enough," the premier told the news agency. "There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians." The announcement prompted t...
Read more

can of worms

I'm opening a sticky subject here, my need to understand causing me to throw caution to the wind. It's about Alberta. Alberta vs. the rest of the Canada. The Globe And Mail runs something about Alberta's gripes every day, and I try to follow along. If it weren't for wmtc's resident Albertan , and the ensuing arguments in comments, I would've had no warning. It's not something Americans know about. As is, observing for more than a year, I have only the smallest of clues. Here's what I know. Please pardon my ignorance and oversimplification, but I have to start somewhere. The province of Alberta is rich, because it has oil. The province of Alberta is conservative, relative to the rest of Canada. Hmm. Funny how those two go together. Because of its great oil wealth, Alberta revenue helps fund services in the rest of Canada. (These are transfer payments?) Apparently many Albertans resent this. They want to keep Alberta's money in Alberta. They don't...
Read more

low confidence

I'm excited about today's no-confidence vote . Only three months after moving here, we'll get to see a government fall, a campaign, and an election, in a system very different from what we're accustomed to. Even the expression "the government will fall" strikes us as oddly dramatic and revolutionary. My sense of current Canadian politics, for what it's worth, tells me that very little will change from the upcoming election. I'd be surprised if the Liberals didn't win. So it's kind of cool to see this happening without a lot at stake. On a semi-tangential note, have I mentioned I'm completely down with "Corner Gas"? Excellent show; I love the deadpan humour. (Great website, too; check it out .) So was that really Finance Minister Ralph Goodale ragging on Brent Butt's camera last Saturday night?
Read more