great news from california

Another victory! A California state judge ruled yesterday that the state's ban on same-sex marriage was unconstitutional, thus overturning a proposition passed in 2000 defining marriage as between a man and woman.

Judge Richard A. Kramer of San Francisco County Superior Court said "the denial of marriage to same-sex couples appears impermissibly arbitrary," thus violating the equal protection clause of the state's Constitution.

According to the New York Times, Judge Kramer's ruling "left no argument against same-sex marriage unexamined, and virtually no glimmer of light for the attorney general's office or the other groups that filed briefs in support of current state law". Whoo-hoo!

The judge compared some of the arguments made by same-sex marriage opponents to those made in cases dealing with interracial marriage laws. "The idea that marriage-like rights without marriage is adequate smacks of a concept long rejected by the courts," he wrote, "separate but equal."

New York Times story here; gay.com story here.

This is especially exciting because I know this is a fight we are going to win. Full citizenship for gay Americans is coming. Like all freedom movements, it faces many obstacles, but it will not be stopped.

Comments

  1. Rognar15 March 2005 at 10:50

    I can already hear the chorus from the Christian Right, "It's all because of those damned Canadians, socialized medicine, gun control, gay marriage. They hate America!"

    ReplyDelete
  2. laura k16 March 2005 at 05:05

    And don't forget marijuana. Gateway to all evils.

    ReplyDelete
  3. holymotherofgod19 March 2005 at 00:06

    Being a Canuck, I normally love to soapbox about how tolerant Canada is to gay marriage. But I find Canadian politics to be truly indicitave of being the US's bitch. Seems like whatever Bush idealizes our own politicians attempt to mimic up here. It's sadly pathetic. And WHY ? WHY do we do this ? It's not like the United States is the only country to trade with, establish a quote unquote relationship with, is it ? I await the day when the religious freaks that apparently have the deepest financial pockets are politically neutered. It disgusts me that they are even ABLE to finance political movements, support political causes, campaigns and agendas.

    Religion does NOT belong anywhere NEAR our laws and legislations. Religion is a PRIVATE and PERSONAL choice.

    Apparently church and state never really divorced... they're still fuck buddies and use each other when it's convenient.

    AMEN.

    ReplyDelete
  4. laura k19 March 2005 at 04:51

    I'm with you all the way on separation of church and state, but are the zealots really a serious force up there? Or are they just a minority voicing their opinion (and trying to influence govt) the way any minority does?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sharia

This morning I see that Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario, is banning the Muslim religious court known as sharia . This ends months of debate about whether sharia would be legal and binding in Ontario. I'm quoting at length from the story in today's Toronto Star because many US readers are likely not up on this. In a surprise announcement that caught both supporters and opponents of sharia law off guard, Premier Dalton McGuinty says he will move quickly to ban all religious arbitration in the province. McGuinty made the announcement in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press yesterday after months of debate and controversy surrounding use of Islamic sharia law in family arbitration. "I've come to the conclusion that the debate has gone on long enough," the premier told the news agency. "There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians." The announcement prompted t...
Read more

can of worms

I'm opening a sticky subject here, my need to understand causing me to throw caution to the wind. It's about Alberta. Alberta vs. the rest of the Canada. The Globe And Mail runs something about Alberta's gripes every day, and I try to follow along. If it weren't for wmtc's resident Albertan , and the ensuing arguments in comments, I would've had no warning. It's not something Americans know about. As is, observing for more than a year, I have only the smallest of clues. Here's what I know. Please pardon my ignorance and oversimplification, but I have to start somewhere. The province of Alberta is rich, because it has oil. The province of Alberta is conservative, relative to the rest of Canada. Hmm. Funny how those two go together. Because of its great oil wealth, Alberta revenue helps fund services in the rest of Canada. (These are transfer payments?) Apparently many Albertans resent this. They want to keep Alberta's money in Alberta. They don't...
Read more

low confidence

I'm excited about today's no-confidence vote . Only three months after moving here, we'll get to see a government fall, a campaign, and an election, in a system very different from what we're accustomed to. Even the expression "the government will fall" strikes us as oddly dramatic and revolutionary. My sense of current Canadian politics, for what it's worth, tells me that very little will change from the upcoming election. I'd be surprised if the Liberals didn't win. So it's kind of cool to see this happening without a lot at stake. On a semi-tangential note, have I mentioned I'm completely down with "Corner Gas"? Excellent show; I love the deadpan humour. (Great website, too; check it out .) So was that really Finance Minister Ralph Goodale ragging on Brent Butt's camera last Saturday night?
Read more