a true conservative

Here is a conservative I respect and admire. Mr Roberts and I will disagree on certain principles, like the uses and role of government, but we will agree on many basic truths.



This clear, concise and hard-hitting essay explains why Bush, Ashcroft, et al, are not conservatives at all.



My favorite bit: "Apparently, Rush Limbaugh and National Review think there is a liberal media because the prison torture scandal could not be suppressed and a cameraman filmed the execution of a wounded Iraqi prisoner by a US Marine." But go read the whole thing, you'll be glad you did.



(Thanks to Redsock for pointing it out to me, of course.)

Comments

  1. Kyle_From_Ottawa10 January 2005 at 06:26

    Well, let's see. In the nineties wasn't being a conservative about "less taxes, less government, and getting government of your back"?

    Bush only qualifies for the less tax part, which combined with bigger government spending would seem like a stupid idea even to a third grade math student.

    ReplyDelete
  2. laura k10 January 2005 at 07:01

    And getting the government off our backs. Let's see: increased restrictions on abortion, government spying on internet, library and bookstore activity, attempts to criminalize homosexual behavior... Oh yeah, they're doing a great job staying out of our lives...

    ReplyDelete
  3. laura k10 January 2005 at 07:35

    Hence progressive libertarian. :) I am certainly the same when it comes to government interference in our private lives. I believe we should have as much personal freedom as possible. But I do want government regulation of business - I think it's important for workers, consumers and the environment, so in that sense I'm not a libertarian.

    I'll check out that essay.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Rognar10 January 2005 at 08:23

    I consider myself a conservative, although by US standards, I'm probably not. My understanding of conservatism comes down to personal freedom balanced by personal responsibility. I don't believe in deficit spending by I think it's irresponsible. The enormous deficits that the Bush administration have been accumulating are anathema to a fiscal conservative like me.

    I also don't like the unwillingness of Bush and Rumsfeld to take responsibility for the mistakes that have been made in Iraq. I didn't disagree with going to war because I wanted to see the Iraqis freed from the oppressive rule of Saddam Hussein. I know that wasn't the real motivation for the war, but it was a worthwhile result nonetheless. Unfortunately, bad planning, diplomatic failures and general incompetence on the part of the administration have turned Iraq into a disaster and no one in the White House is willing to acknowledge that fact.

    ReplyDelete
  5. laura k10 January 2005 at 10:41

    I think you are probably quite moderate by US standards. You are clearly too humane and sensible to be an American conservative. ;-)

    I can appreciate your beliefs about the war. It is obviously a good thing to get Saddam Hussein out of power.

    For many Americans, though, it's more complicated. We were lied to about the reasons for war (WMDs); Bush and Cheney cronies profit hugely from it; the govt does not support the very men and women who risk their lives in the war; it costs a fortune which is badly needed at home; thousands, possibly hundreds of thousands, of Iraqi civilians have been killed in it; it sows hatred towards the US and (many of us believe) increases the risks of terrorism rather than reduces it.

    I fear that under the Bush regime, the US will always be at war. One long, endless, useless war. Lives lost, lives ruined, bodies maimed, money wasted.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Rognar10 January 2005 at 11:20

    Oh yeah, and you've got some really scary religious types down there which seem more fascist than conservative to me. We don't have a "separation of church and state" component in our constitution the way you have in the US, yet we seem to manage to avoid having these culture wars over religion and its place in society. The majority of Canadians, including most conservatives I know, seem to think religious beliefs are a private manner.

    ReplyDelete
  7. laura k10 January 2005 at 11:32

    The seemingly defunct state of separation of church and state is probably the single biggest factor alienating Americans and driving folks like me away. It's alienating Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus (etc) alike. It just keeps getting worse and worse. Some days a full-blown theocracy seems not far off.

    Someone sent me a good column from the G&M on this, I'm going to post excerpts soon.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

sharia

This morning I see that Dalton McGuinty, Premier of Ontario, is banning the Muslim religious court known as sharia . This ends months of debate about whether sharia would be legal and binding in Ontario. I'm quoting at length from the story in today's Toronto Star because many US readers are likely not up on this. In a surprise announcement that caught both supporters and opponents of sharia law off guard, Premier Dalton McGuinty says he will move quickly to ban all religious arbitration in the province. McGuinty made the announcement in a telephone interview with The Canadian Press yesterday after months of debate and controversy surrounding use of Islamic sharia law in family arbitration. "I've come to the conclusion that the debate has gone on long enough," the premier told the news agency. "There will be no sharia law in Ontario. There will be no religious arbitration in Ontario. There will be one law for all Ontarians." The announcement prompted t...
Read more

can of worms

I'm opening a sticky subject here, my need to understand causing me to throw caution to the wind. It's about Alberta. Alberta vs. the rest of the Canada. The Globe And Mail runs something about Alberta's gripes every day, and I try to follow along. If it weren't for wmtc's resident Albertan , and the ensuing arguments in comments, I would've had no warning. It's not something Americans know about. As is, observing for more than a year, I have only the smallest of clues. Here's what I know. Please pardon my ignorance and oversimplification, but I have to start somewhere. The province of Alberta is rich, because it has oil. The province of Alberta is conservative, relative to the rest of Canada. Hmm. Funny how those two go together. Because of its great oil wealth, Alberta revenue helps fund services in the rest of Canada. (These are transfer payments?) Apparently many Albertans resent this. They want to keep Alberta's money in Alberta. They don't...
Read more

low confidence

I'm excited about today's no-confidence vote . Only three months after moving here, we'll get to see a government fall, a campaign, and an election, in a system very different from what we're accustomed to. Even the expression "the government will fall" strikes us as oddly dramatic and revolutionary. My sense of current Canadian politics, for what it's worth, tells me that very little will change from the upcoming election. I'd be surprised if the Liberals didn't win. So it's kind of cool to see this happening without a lot at stake. On a semi-tangential note, have I mentioned I'm completely down with "Corner Gas"? Excellent show; I love the deadpan humour. (Great website, too; check it out .) So was that really Finance Minister Ralph Goodale ragging on Brent Butt's camera last Saturday night?
Read more